I reviewed the generated articles against the transcript and the editorial rules provided. For each issues category (spelling, clarity, chronology, framing, misinformation, misidentification, out_of_context, quantitative_precision, process_clarity, context_clarity, agency_clarity, question_emphasis, omission, bias, duplicate) I found no outstanding problems that require a content change.

Why it matters: the audit ensures the articles attribute quotes only to speakers present in the transcript, do not add facts not in the meeting, and preserve distinctions between discussion, direction and formal action.

Summary of checks: all direct quotes are attributed to speakers included in each article's speaker list; legal and administrative references are limited to those cited during the meeting (for example, Senate Bill 215 and the proposed Chapter 10 amendment); discussions were not presented as formal actions unless a vote was recorded; numerical values were labeled as approximate where the transcript used non-exact language.

If you want a separate, itemized list of every transcript line used for each article, I can provide a full block-by-block provenance export.