Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Administration topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Community Board 11 debates minutes, staffing and bylaws; chair urges consistent committee minute submission
Summary
Board leadership pressed for faster submission and publication of committee minutes, proposed a seven‑day draft timeline and encouraged committee chairs to assign minute-takers; members raised concerns about staff workload and asked for clearer role distribution among three full‑time office staff.
Community Board 11 leaders and members used the full board meeting to press for a faster, clearer process for preparing and posting committee minutes and to discuss how office staff responsibilities should be shared.
At the meeting, board leadership said draft minutes should be sent to staff and the committee chair within seven calendar days so the board office can post minutes within the board’s two‑week standard. A board member stated succinctly during the discussion: “I would say within the week,” when asked what timeline chairs should follow; another member noted, “Technically, they're supposed to be up within 2 weeks.”
Board members and the district manager described friction between volunteers and staff over who prepares and posts minutes. Several board members urged the executive board to meet with staff to clarify responsibilities and relieve the board chair of disproportionate administrative burden. One member said the office employs three full‑time staffers and argued the work should be shared among them instead of falling heavily on 1 staffer or on the chair.
The board’s bylaws and ethics committee reported it will consider a more comprehensive revision of the bylaws, because the meeting has produced many incremental amendments. Committee chairs were urged to assign a secretary or minute‑taker at each meeting and to forward drafts to staff promptly.
Why this matters: timely and accurate minutes are required for transparency, legal recordkeeping and public access. The board discussed specific, implementable steps — assigning minute‑takers and using a seven‑day draft deadline — but no formal bylaw change or binding procedural rule was adopted during the meeting.
The board did not vote to change the bylaws at the meeting but indicated the bylaws committee will consider a holistic rewrite.
