Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Displacement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Displaced tenants from Wallace Avenue fire urge faster rehousing; board asks elected officials to follow up
Summary
Tenants displaced after a fire at 2910 Wallace Avenue told Community Board 11 they remain without stable housing and urged immediate help; the board invited elected officials present to assist and asked attendees to follow up after the meeting.
Get email alerts on the Housing Displacement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Tenants displaced by a building fire at 2910 Wallace Avenue urged Bronx Community Board 11 and elected representatives to accelerate rehousing efforts, describing ongoing displacement and shelter stays months after the incident.
Yolanda Richardson, introduced at the board’s housing and land‑use discussion as a tenant association leader from 2910 Wallace Avenue, told the board: “We want it now. … Many of us are working class. We don't qualify for low income subsidies with the vouchers and things of that nature. So we're stuck.” Richardson said many displaced residents remain in shelters or with family and appealed for help finding permanent housing and faster placement in the community.
Board members and the meeting chair invited representatives from elected offices present at the meeting to speak with Richardson after the session and to coordinate next steps. At the meeting, the chair said the tenant group had been brought forward so elected representatives and staff in attendance could be connected directly with affected tenants.
No formal vote, referral, or specific program allocation was recorded during the meeting; the discussion concluded with a request that community members and elected‑office staff exchange contact information and pursue resources after the meeting.
Why this matters: displaced renters who cannot access available rental-assistance programs or housing vouchers face prolonged stays in shelters and fractured community ties. The tenants’ remarks underscore gaps between available units and households that do not qualify for certain subsidies, and they put pressure on local officials and nonprofit partners to coordinate rehousing solutions.
The board did not record a formal motion or commitment of specific housing units during the meeting; tenants were directed to follow up with elected‑office staff and the board’s office for assistance.

