Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Estate Division Variance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves variance at 1347 Gross Road to allow estate division after owner's hardship claim

5810671 · September 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A property owner identified as Miss Howland received approval to split her parcel at 1347 Gross Road to provide land to her son and grandson as part of estate settlement; the board accepted the hardship rationale and granted the variance under the county process cited as Section 10.8(c) and 10.60 in discussion.

The Board of Zoning Appeals on Sept. 18 approved a variance allowing Miss Howland to divide her property at 1347 Gross Road so portions can be transferred to her son and grandson in settlement of an estate. Howland said she is settling her late husband’s estate and lacks cash to distribute, so she intends to divide land rather than pay heirs directly. She told the board she planned to carve off the house parcel (about two and a half acres) and convey portions of the remaining property to family members; access and existing driveways were discussed during the hearing. Staff and board members referenced the county’s variance procedures and cited Section 10.8(c) and the variance standards in the hearing. Anna moved to approve the variance and Tim seconded; the board voted in favor after review of the hardship claim and the finding language was read into the record. Nut graf: The variance permits a smaller lot to be created to enable estate division where the owner asserted family hardship; board members confirmed the parcel layout provides access for the retained portions and that the requested split addresses the owner's stated needs. Board discussion clarified that the long driveway provides access to the back parcels, that the owner was asking only for the minimum necessary split for the house lot, and that the application fit into the county’s variance process. No public opposition was recorded and the board approved the variance by voice vote. Ending: The board advised the applicant to complete any necessary application paperwork and to work with staff to record the division once the variance requirements and any documentation are completed.