Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Superintendent Evaluation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Worthington board approves superintendent’s first‑year evaluation goals and a feedback form

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board approved three performance goal areas and selected MSBA sample evaluation form 2 for superintendent Joel Heitkamp’s evaluation, adding a special‑education review metric and scheduling a 90‑day check‑in and midyear/summative dates to be set later.

The Worthington School Board approved Superintendent Joel Heitkamp’s proposed evaluation goals and selected the Minnesota School Boards Association sample evaluation form 2 for use in the year‑long review process. Heitkamp presented three goal areas: establishing foundational relationships with stakeholders, enhancing district culture and safety, and reviewing financial health and resource allocation. He asked the board to use sample form 2 because it allows rubric scoring plus space for specific written feedback; trustees voted to adopt the form and the goals with the addition of a metric to bring in assistance for a special‑education review and analysis. Why it matters: the approved goals establish the measures by which the superintendent will be evaluated this year, and the board approved a feedback process intended to combine qualitative comments with a 4‑3‑2‑1 rubric. Timeline and process: Heitkamp said his contract calls for a 90‑day evaluation; he asked the board to set a date for a midyear evaluation and a summative year‑end evaluation. The board approved the goals and the use of sample form 2 at the meeting and agreed to remove sample form 1 from consideration. No contentious debate: board members expressed support for the collaborative process Heitkamp described; one trustee asked for the special‑education review metric to be added to show progress on resource management and to credit work already started. The board approved the motion with a standard voice vote.