District 211 adopts 2025-26 fiscal year budget after public hearing; one member abstains

5819859 · September 18, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Township High School District 211 Board of Education adopted its fiscal year 2025-26 budget after opening and closing a public hearing. The roll call showed one abstention and one dissent; a community member questioned whether district policies could put federal funds at risk.

The Township High School District 211 Board of Education voted to adopt the 2025-26 fiscal-year budget at a regularly scheduled meeting after conducting a public hearing required under state law.

The board opened the public hearing on the 2025-26 budget under Section 5/17-1.3 of the Illinois School Code and invited public comment. One resident, Stacy Yale, addressed the board during the hearing and asked whether current district policies governing transgender access to private spaces and sports could put federal funding at risk. Yale requested that, if the risk were real or unknown, the board consider postponing instruction until the spring semester to protect federal funding.

After the public hearing closed, the board voted to adopt the budget as presented. The roll call recorded Mr. Van Dyke as —abstain,— Mr. Dombrowski as —no— and other members voting —aye.— The motion passed. Dr. Judith Campbell, superintendent, and Lauren Hummel, chief operating officer, were listed as the recommending officials for the budget.

Board members did not make changes to the proposed budget during the meeting. The hearing and subsequent adoption complied with the district's requirement to publish cash balances in agenda items 7D and 9A and to hold the public hearing before adoption.

The public record includes the speaker's questions about potential federal funding implications; the board did not provide an immediate legal determination at the meeting. Any follow-up on the specific funding-risk question would come through staff, legal counsel or future board action.