Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Condemnation Authority topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Will County Board authorizes state's attorney to pursue condemnation for 140 Third Street improvements

5810740 · September 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Will County Board approved Resolution 25-265, authorizing the Will County State's Attorneyto proceed with condemnation cases related to improvements at 140 Third Street; the vote passed 12-0 after questions about whether discussion had formally closed.

The Will County Board voted to approve Resolution 25-265, authorizing the Will County State's Attorneyto proceed with condemnation cases tied to county improvements at 140 Third Street. The motion passed with 12 votes in the affirmative. "12 in the affirmative. The motion carries," the clerk announced.

Board members debated whether discussion on the resolution had formally closed before the roll call. Several members asked the state's attorney to read and explain the "now, therefore, be it resolved" language; the state's attorney said the clause gives his office authority to begin condemnation proceedings. "Your question is, what is the legal effect of the now fair for be excuse me, be resolved. It's that the state's attorney's office can move forward with the condemnation," the Will County State's Attorney said.

Why it matters: the resolution grants legal authority to begin condemnation steps tied to the county's road improvement project referenced in the meeting as the Republic Road project. Board members pressed for clarity on the motion's legal impact before voting.

What was discussed: some board members raised procedural concerns about whether the discussion had been officially closed and about a temporary recording outage. A board member asked whether a technology failure affected the vote; a county official responded that the recording is a public courtesy and "is not required by law." The state's attorney framed the resolution as limited to authority for condemnation under the U.S. and state constitutions and tied to completing the Republic Road project.

Formal action: Resolution 25-265, as amended, was approved. The clerk recorded 12 affirmative votes and declared the motion carried.

Context and next steps: The state's attorney said the resolution is one piece of the larger Republic Road work; other project steps will proceed separately. The board did not adopt additional policy language in this vote beyond authorizing the state's attorney to pursue condemnation as described.