Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Antisemitism Resolution topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Miami Beach adopts antisemitism resolution after hours of testimony and tribute to Holocaust survivor David Schachter
Summary
The commission unanimously approved a city resolution reinforcing opposition to antisemitism and related measures; the meeting included tributes to Holocaust survivor David Schachter, many public comments both supporting and opposing city policy on Israel, and a debate over free speech and BDS.
The City Commission on Sept. 17 adopted a resolution strengthening the city’s stance against antisemitism and honoring the legacy of recently deceased Holocaust survivor David Schachter.
The commission convened a lengthy public‑comment period before the vote that included students from Hebrew Academy, survivors’ families and dozens of residents who both supported and criticized the proposed actions. Supporters urged the city to publicly condemn antisemitic threats and enhance protection for Jewish institutions. Opponents and other residents said criticism of Israeli government policies should not be conflated with antisemitism.
Context: Earlier this month a video tribute and remarks commemorated David Schachter, who founded the Holocaust Memorial and advocated against antisemitism for decades. Commissioners said Schachter’s passing and the rising national incidents of anti‑Jewish violence made the resolution timely.
What the commission approved: Commissioners voted to adopt the antisemitism resolution and related measures during the meeting. Commissioner David Suarez argued the city should not subsidize or award contracts to entities that participate in organized boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) of Israel; legal and constitutional questions about boycotts were debated in public comment.
Public comment and the fault lines: The public record included sharply divergent testimony. Speakers such as Joseph Sabag (National Jewish Advocacy Center) and many students and parents urged the city to take a firm stand. Other speakers — including members and supporters of Jewish Voice for Peace and residents who described themselves as Jewish — warned that criticism of Israel is not inherently antisemitic and that the city’s actions risk chilling protected speech. Several speakers called for more transparent consultation with neighborhood groups on policies that affect civic engagement.
Commission response and outcome: Commissioners framed the resolution as a stand against violence and intimidation rather than an attempt to restrict legitimate political expression; the resolution passed unanimously. Several commissioners said the city would pursue additional steps to protect places of worship and nearby schools and to support Holocaust education.
Ending: The vote concluded an unusually long public comment session that drew students, neighborhood residents and national‑issue advocates. Commissioners said they will continue to refine the city’s approach to hate incidents, public‑safety responses and careful legal review of any policy that could affect protected speech.
