Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects Renovation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Officials say Old Central Elementary renovation contingency has been exhausted; $400,000 raise recommended
Summary
Project managers told the board that unforeseen conditions in the 1951 building have consumed over $450,000 of a $650,000 contingency; staff recommended raising contingency to $1,075,000 to finish work to district standards.
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects Renovation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District staff and the project manager for the Old Central Elementary renovation told the board that the project has encountered unforeseen conditions that have used more than $450,000 of the original $650,000 contingency and that the team recommends raising contingency to $1,075,000.
Austin Beyer, senior project manager with the district’s construction partner, said the building — constructed in 1951 — has hidden conditions typical for work in older structures. Beyer identified principal cost drivers as removing and replacing deteriorated site concrete to match district standards (about $50,000), electrical and technology cabling and equipment upgrades in the preschool area (about $150,000), extensive wall and drywall repairs where multiple layers or water damage were uncovered (about $160,000), and other electrical items (about $70,000). He also cited clerestory windows that show water damage and may require repair or replacement.
Mr. Dennis told the board the original prime bids for the project were just under $9.3 million and said the district currently has $53,078,525.75 of contract work under the bond series that supports multiple projects. He said the district has roughly $8.7 million of that authorization remaining and has already earned $886,000 in interest on bond proceeds as of Aug. 31. Based on those figures, staff recommended increasing the project contingency by just under $400,000; Mr. Dennis said the increase does not exceed the district’s current authorization.
Project staff emphasized a preference to “make it right” rather than leave visible deficiencies that would require earlier follow‑up work. The recommendation was informational at the meeting; no formal contingency increase vote was recorded in the public minutes provided.

