Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pay Raises State Match topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates pay raises, county match for state-paid employees at 22%
Summary
Committee members discussed whether the county should match state raises for employees paid largely by the state and whether to return to a percentage-based approach rather than hourly-dollar increases.
Committee members discussed how to calculate annual raises for staff who are paid primarily through state funding and whether to return to matching the state percentage increase. Speaker 2 described the county—s long-standing practice: for many state-paid positions the county covers roughly 22% of the employee—s compensation and the state covers the remainder. Speaker 2 said matching the state—s percentage increase "on the 22%" would simplify budgeting.
Speaker 3 disagreed that matching the state was always sufficient, saying county-paid portions still represent real compensation that should be considered in raising pay. Members compared two approaches: an across-the-board dollar-per-hour raise and matching the state percentage; several said a percentage match is easier to administer and track.
No final decision was adopted at the meeting. The committee directed staff to include guidance on how state-funded positions should receive annual increases in the next draft of the personnel manual. Speaker 2 urged that the county not exceed a 22% contribution on state raises except in exceptional years.
The transcript includes examples of past state increases (one speaker cited a recent state rate of about 2.4%), and participants said the county has moved between dollar-per-hour and percentage systems in prior years, creating budgeting and pay-line inconsistencies. The committee asked staff to present clear language on which positions are eligible for a state-match approach and how part-time raises should be handled.
