Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Participation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners keep Speak Up Brevard rules unchanged after residents urge longer submission window and annual workshop
Summary
Commissioner Delaney proposed changes to the county's Speak Up Brevard citizen-submission policy (extend submission window, codify an annual workshop and other process changes). After public comments in favor of Delaney's revisions, the board voted 4-1 to keep the existing policy; Delaney voted no.
A proposal to revise the county's Speak Up Brevard citizen-submission policy drew public comment and a split vote at the Sept. 16 Brevard County Board of County Commissioners meeting.
Background: Commissioner Delaney brought suggested amendments to the program that would, among other measures described in a draft policy, extend the submission window (the discussion refers to lengthening from 30 days to 60 or to retain 120 days), codify an annual workshop to review submitted ideas, and clarify submission and response procedures.
Public remarks: Frequent public commenters supported the revision. Rick Heffelfinger said the county should “just do it and let's put this to bed,” urging the board to codify a more user-friendly process and to avoid treating citizen suggestions as an afterthought. Elizabeth Blackford, who said she represents an ad hoc group working to improve the program, told commissioners, “We are committed to improving this important tool that residents have to participate in their government,” and supported Delaney's changes. Sarah Hodge urged better public-record access and said citizens should not have to pay high fees or wait for records.
Board action and outcome: Vice Chair Goodson moved to keep the policy unchanged; Commissioner Atkinson seconded. The clerk called the roll: Delaney voted no; Goodson, Atkinson, Altman and Chair Feltner voted yes. The motion to retain the existing policy passed 4-1.
Why it matters: The Speak Up Brevard program governs how residents submit proposals and requests for board consideration. Commenters said the current timing and placement of items at the end of lengthy meetings make participation difficult and that better procedures would increase transparency and public trust.
Ending: The board voted to maintain the current policy at the Sept. 16 meeting; commissioners and members of the public said they plan continued work on ways to help residents research and prepare submissions so staff time is productive and items are ready for board consideration.
