Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Judge Denies Perricone's Request to Testify Remotely, Citing Late Filing and Questions About Pleadings' Authorship; Motions Reset to Oct. 31

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The court denied a motion filed under Rule 43.01 to allow remote testimony after the filing deadline and said it had doubts whether Perricone drafted her pleadings personally or used outside assistance; the court reset the motions for Oct. 31.

A chancery judge denied Miss Perricone's request to present testimony remotely under Rule 43.01 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure, concluding her motion was filed too late and noting concerns about whether pleadings were authored by the party or by another person or technology. The court reset the related motions for Oct. 31.

The judge explained Rule…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans