Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Meetings Act topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
General counsel reviews changes to Utah Open and Public Meetings Act, warns board on text‑message records and required disclosures
Summary
Canyons School District general counsel Dan Harper reviewed recent clarifications to the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act, recordkeeping under GRAMA and updated conflict‑of‑interest disclosure duties at the Sept. 16 meeting.
Dan Harper, general counsel for Canyons School District, presented the district’s annual Open and Public Meetings Act (OPMA) training during the Sept. 16 study session, summarizing recent statutory clarifications and practical guidance for board members.
Harper highlighted a key legislative refinement that narrows and clarifies the statutory definition of “meeting” to focus on gatherings convened to deliberate or act as a public body. He said the change reduces ambiguity about whether informal communications constitute a meeting and allows for clearer use of electronic meeting tools when policies permit.
Harper also cautioned members about record retention and informal communications. He said text messages can be considered public records under GRAMA (the state’s Government Records Access and Management Act) and that, while transitory text messages may ordinarily be deleted, they must be retained if subject to a records request or litigation hold.
On closed‑meeting procedures, Harper reviewed the formal mechanics for convening a closed session—including required notice, vote thresholds and reasons for a closed meeting—and reminded members that final votes must be taken in public. He summarized potential penalties for willful OPMA violations, noting the statute provides criminal penalties and that courts may void actions taken in violation.
Harper also addressed conflicts of interest and a recent legislative change requiring elected officials to proactively publish certain financial‑interest disclosures rather than relying solely on on‑the‑spot disclosure forms. He stressed the legal standard: a conflict of interest involves a pecuniary (financial) interest that could be affected by a board action (for example, contracts above thresholds that require board approval).
Ending: Harper answered clarifying questions from board members about recordings and how closed‑session minutes and affidavits are handled and closed the session noting staff will provide materials and links for members’ reference.
