Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Public raises transparency and audit concerns over proposed Golden Gate Transit-Amalgamated retirement plan merger with CalPERS

September 17, 2025 | California Public Employees Retirement System, Agencies under Office of the Governor, Executive, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Public raises transparency and audit concerns over proposed Golden Gate Transit-Amalgamated retirement plan merger with CalPERS
John Holden, a participant who said he is a member of the Golden Gate Transit Amalgamated Retirement Plan, addressed the board during public comment and said a Freedom of Information Act request for materials about a possible CalPERS merger was denied by a CalPERS staff member. He expressed concerns about the plan’s audit and funding and called for a forensic review before CalPERS considers any merger.

Holden said he requested records related to a review of the GGTARP plan and that his public‑records request, which he said was made July 2 and assigned tracking number 9072, was denied by Brad Pacheco, an ex‑deputy executive officer in communications. "I find that the comments of transparency and risk management, when I cannot even get one paper from CalPERS seeing what they are putting forward," Holden said, urging CalPERS to perform a deep forensic audit if the plan’s numbers are questionable.

Board oversight response: Malia Cohen, chair of the Risk & Audit Committee, noted public comment on agenda item 4C and asked that the director or CEO respond to John Holden directly with regard to his public‑records request. The committee’s public record of the meeting shows staff acknowledged the request and the committee recorded Holden’s PRA number for follow‑up.

Why it matters: a plan merger would transfer liabilities and obligations to CalPERS; transparency around actuarial assumptions, funding status and legal responsibilities is central to the board’s due‑diligence obligations. Holden warned of potential conflicts of interest and legal liabilities tied to plan governance and asked CalPERS to withhold any decision until a thorough review is completed.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal