Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Processes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board backs LDR changes to implement state law, create 'subdivision plan' step and allow administrative plat approvals
Summary
The board recommended approval of a package of Land Development Regulation amendments to implement state requirements for administrative plat approval, create a 'subdivision plan' review step where no site plan exists, and require financial guarantees for major plats.
Get email alerts on the Planning Processes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Planning and Zoning Board on Tuesday recommended that the city commission adopt changes to the Land Development Regulations to align local plat procedures with a state law requiring administrative approval of plats. Rebecca Dawson, planning staff, told the board the amendment establishes a new "subdivision plan" review step to evaluate layout and urban form when a site plan or master development plan is not already in place, and it distinguishes "major" plats (those that create new streets or extend utilities) from "minor" plats. "This amendment is before you because, the last legislative session, there was the bill that requires administrative approval of all plats, which is actually something that staff is very happy about," Dawson said. Under the proposed changes, the director would have administrative authority to approve plats that do not request relief; subdivision plans and plats that request relief would come to the Planning and Zoning Board or Historic Preservation Board for final action and then to the commission if required. The amendment also requires that major plats provide financial guarantees for roads/utilities before plat approval; minor plats that already have infrastructure in place could post required guarantees at building permit stage. Dawson said the change closes a procedural gap where some proposals previously lacked an avenue for design review if no site plan or master development plan existed. Board member Mitch Katz moved to recommend approval; the motion passed unanimously. Board members and staff said the amendments are intended to streamline a duplicative process while preserving design review where it is needed. Dawson offered examples during the presentation and cited the intent to retain review standards that ensure functional circulation, landscaping and urban form even when plats are administratively approved. The recommended ordinance will proceed to the city commission for final adoption.

