Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Civic Engagement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council amends rules to create youth council liaison, not a city-run youth commission

5766069 · September 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Newcastle City Council on Sept. 16 amended its operating policies to create a youth-council liaison role instead of a council-appointed youth commission, voting 5-1 to adopt Resolution 2025-1057.

The Newcastle City Council on Sept. 16 adopted Resolution 2025-1057, amending council operating policies to establish a youth-council liaison role rather than a city-run youth commission. The resolution passed on a 5-1 vote.

City manager staff and legal counsel recommended the liaison approach after a presentation on Aug. 19 proposing a youth council. The staff presentation said making the youth body an independent community organization with a council liaison avoids automatic Open Public Meetings Act and public-records obligations that would arise if the city formally appointed or managed members. The city manager told the council the amendment "adjusts it to being a youth council liaison section rather than youth commission section" and that the city would play a supportive rather than a driving role.

Supporters said the change preserves youth engagement while managing liability and staff workload. Asha Sika (referred to in the meeting as Ashna/Asha) attended and described plans for application, virtual interviews and a hoped-for first meeting in October; she said leadership elections would follow and a separate application would cover the leadership liaison position.

Council member Griffin raised concerns about timing in an election season and asked whether creating the liaison could be perceived as electioneering; the city attorney responded that he did not see a violation of the state statute prohibiting use of public facilities for campaign purposes (RCW 42.17A.555) and that council members regularly advance ideas. Other councilmembers asked about liability if a youth group met in council chambers; staff said the city has a facility-use policy requiring insurance and hold-harmless agreements and that the city manager could waive small fees for community partners in particular circumstances.

The resolution was moved and seconded; the final vote was 5 in favor, 1 opposed. The city manager said staff will provide facilities guidance and will coordinate the liaison role once the youth council finalizes its leadership and application process.