Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development Agreements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff, developers move to separate Exchange development agreement and clarify entitlements in Ogden Valley
Summary
Staff and developers described a proposed split of a combined development agreement that will carve the Exchange property out into its own development agreement, clarify prior concept‑plan inconsistencies and limit project height and unit counts per planning commission recommendations.
County planning staff and Exchange developers told the commission Sept. 15 they are preparing a standalone development agreement for the Exchange project in Ogden Valley that will separate it from a larger, combined development agreement covering adjacent projects and will clarify project entitlements and standards.
Planning staff said the original combined approvals — dating back to earlier concept plans and development agreements — created confusion because one printed exhibit showed only the core area while older approvals had included the broader commercial zoning. Staff said the proposed amendment is intended to reconcile the record and make the Exchange’s entitlements and standards explicit.
The planning commission reviewed the proposed standalone agreement and recommended approval with conditions, staff said. Among the conditions are a cap on residential units (84 units maximum) unless the future city alters its transfer‑of‑development‑rights (TDR) program; a building‑height limit lowered to 50 feet to match county code (the planning commission rejected a 60‑foot request); architectural and landscape standards consistent with the county’s form‑based guidance; and a traffic‑impact study that will include winter‑weekend analysis coordinated with UDOT as appropriate.
Staff said the proposed agreement includes provisions used in other recently approved projects to clarify whether county or city review and inspections occur during a transition to a newly incorporated city — the county will select review staff until the city or county formally takes responsibility.
Developers and staff also discussed pathway connections and parkland standards; planning staff said the applicant agreed to construct a pathway up to Elk Horn Drive and to make best efforts to connect trails through golf course parcels, subject to final engineering and safety concerns related to highway crossings.
Staff indicated they will finalize the agreement with the applicant and return it for public hearing within two to three weeks. Commissioners said the planning commission process and the drafting approach have addressed many prior concerns, and staff will bring the final development agreement back to the commission for formal action.
