Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Instructional Materials Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates supplemental materials approval and technology policy; principals seek more discretion
Summary
Trustees reviewed consolidated policies on instructional materials, supplemental technology and website/social media use and pushed administration to preserve principal-level discretion for small purchases while ensuring curricular alignment and digital compatibility.
Get email alerts on the Instructional Materials Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The board examined draft policy language that consolidates several existing rules on instructional materials, supplemental technology and websites. Miss Dillard said the draft pulls multiple older policies together and that teaching and learning edited the language; she noted the district did not adopt AASB model language for this consolidated policy.
Board member Mister Dorn voiced caution that one sentence requiring “approval from the executive director” before purchasing materials could be “extremely restrictive in terms of principals as instructional leaders” and limit principals’ ability to buy small supplemental classroom resources. Dorn said principals have historically bought modest classroom supplements — for example, “Mad Minutes” computation sheets or SpellingCity subscriptions — without district‑level approval. He asked for clarifying language to distinguish ordinary classroom supplies from curricular supplemental materials that require alignment checks.
Superintendent/administration representatives said principals would retain the right to purchase routine supplies and that the approval process aimed to ensure curricular alignment and digital compatibility with district systems. Doctor Maynard (administration) said some purchases—especially digital materials—require conversations with teaching and learning to ensure alignment with curriculum and device compatibility.
On technology policy, trustees supported separating core curricular materials from supplemental technology because of different approval paths and legal/regulatory notes. On damaged or lost instructional materials and equipment (new policy), trustees suggested tightening redundant language and being mindful of how policies are worded about expense and replacement.
Board members also discussed a websites/pages policy and social‑media guidance. Doctor Meinert (communications) said the director of communications works with schools on templates and best practices and that detailed branding guidance may belong in administrative regulation rather than policy.
The board asked administration to: refine the supplemental‑materials approval sentence to preserve principal discretion for modest purchases, move technical details into administrative regulation where appropriate, and return revised drafts for first reading.

