Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Erp Software Maintenance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Technology committee approves $250,380 ERP maintenance contract with Infor US Inc.
Summary
The Technology Committee approved a one-year, sole-source maintenance and support contract with Infor US Inc. for the county’s ERP software, while staff said the county is implementing Dayforce for HR/payroll and will replace the financial modules over the next two to three years.
The Technology Committee voted to approve a contract purchase order with Infor US Inc. for ERP software maintenance and support for the period Dec. 1, 2025, through Nov. 30, 2026, for a contract total not to exceed $250,380.75. The committee approved the motion by voice vote.
Committee Chair called for the motion and members voted “Aye.” The motion was seconded and approved without recorded opposition.
Staff member, presenting the item, said the contract covers maintenance for the county’s existing Infor system while the county implements a new human-resources and payroll platform. “We are currently implementing the HR portion of the system. Payroll. Next year, we'll go out for the financial side,” the Staff member said. The presenter added that the county will implement Dayforce for HR and payroll and expects the finance side of a new ERP to take “probably another 2 to 3 years” to replace.
The discussion made a clear distinction between the current maintenance contract (a formal action approved by the committee) and the ongoing implementation work: staff described the Dayforce rollout as covering HR and payroll only, and said Infor maintenance is needed to keep existing ERP functions running until the finance modules are migrated.
No public comment was made on the item during the meeting, and no amendments or alternative motions were offered.
Because the transcript and committee discussion identified this contract as a sole-source/proprietary maintenance agreement, the article reports that characterization as stated by staff; no additional procurement or legal determinations were described during the meeting.
The committee’s approval authorizes payment for the maintenance year specified in the motion; committee members did not set further conditions or direct additional follow-up in the meeting.
