Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission asks council for legal opinion on options to temporarily suspend cluster‑housing ordinance
Summary
Citing multiple drafting problems, commissioners asked City Council for a legal opinion on options to temporarily suspend or otherwise limit use of the current cluster‑housing ordinance while a revised code is prepared.
The Planning Commission voted on Feb. 25 to ask City Council for a legal opinion about options to temporarily suspend or limit use of the city’s cluster‑housing ordinance while the commission and staff develop revised regulations.
Commissioner Riley summarized a review that flagged subjective language, vague or conflicting criteria, and a lack of parking, pedestrian and infrastructure standards in the existing cluster‑housing chapter. Commissioners said the ordinance, adopted quickly after the fire and code updates, had not been fully vetted and could produce undesired outcomes on larger parcels if implemented as‑written.
The motion, which commissioners amended to request options from the city attorney, passed on a roll call vote. Commissioners and staff discussed whether a suspension would require emergency authority, a code amendment or some other legal mechanism; ex‑officio staff and the city attorney will advise council on the available options.
Why it matters: Commissioners said the current language could allow intensive infill outcomes that do not match community expectations for “cottage cluster” development, and they asked for legal guidance before new applications use the existing standards.
Ending: The commission asked staff to forward the request to City Council with supporting documentation; council will decide whether to ask the city attorney for an opinion and whether to act on any short‑term limits while a revised ordinance is drafted.
