Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the K 12 Education Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Joshua ISD reports low summer retest pass rates; officials highlight campus gains
Summary
At a board workshop, district staff reported summer retest outcomes — 91 tests proctored with 16% passing English I and 12% passing English II — and reviewed campus performance gains, attendance improvements and customer-satisfaction scores.
At its board workshop, district staff reported that Joshua Independent School District proctored 91 summer retests in June; 16 percent of students passed English I and 12 percent passed English II, district staff said. Students who did not pass will take the retest again in December and are receiving tutoring at the high school.
District staff said the district uses targets of 100% of students at the "approaches" level, 75% at "meets," and 50% at "masters" when evaluating results. The presenter said the district showed year-over-year gains from 2023 to 2024 in several measures and that a new curriculum introduced midyear is contributing to movement at the meets and approaches levels.
Officials also reviewed attendance and district financial indicators. The presenter reported the district financial scorecard at 82% and said the district's customer-satisfaction survey registered at about 95%. Several individual campuses reported improvements: one campus rose from 79 to 87 overall and earned five of seven distinctions, and others reported increases in domain scores and distinctions earned.
District staff emphasized that students who missed the summer retest are working with tutors and will be re-tested in December. No new policy changes or board actions were recorded on the retest data; the presentation was informational.
Why it matters: low summer pass rates mean a larger group of secondary students will need continued intervention this fall and a second retest in December, while campus-level gains suggest pockets of academic improvement to build on.
Details and context: the district presentation included a breakdown by domain and grade-level performance and noted that English I and II accounted for the bulk of retest activity. Staff credited changes in curriculum and targeted tutoring with recent gains but did not report finalized districtwide corrective actions in the meeting.
