Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council establishes Housing Stability Task Force chair and sets fast timeline after debate over pace and membership
Summary
Following debate about timing, member selection and developer participation, the council named Councilmember Patrick chair of the new City Housing Stability Task Force and directed staff to solicit applications with a target schedule for appointment and an initial meeting in early October.
The City Housing Stability Task Force — a nine-member panel the council created to study housing stability issues — advanced at the Government Operations committee after council members debated pace, membership criteria and whether developers should serve as voting members.
Council President Porterfield opened the committee discussion by urging members to assign leadership and move the project forward. Speakers said the council had approved a follow-on resolution that specified membership and an application process, that the resolution became operational by charter timing, and that the first meeting was to be held within 30 days after adoption (the 30-day window would have fallen on Oct. 5 under the timeline members discussed).
Several council members expressed concern that the initiative had slowed and that a meaningful first meeting was preferable to a merely ceremonial convening. One council member urged a “no later than” approach to scheduling while another said the council should avoid a “performative” meeting and instead ensure real work.
After discussion about how to handle applicants and whether developers should be voting members (members agreed developers should be solicited for information but not serve as public voting members), the committee directed staff to publish the application and solicit applicants. The council also moved a resolution to appoint Councilmember Patrick as the chair of the task force; that motion was seconded and approved by voice vote.
Committee members discussed a tight schedule for review and appointment. A council member proposed a special council meeting on Sept. 29 to review and vote on applicants, with an initial task-force meeting on Oct. 3; others proposed a meeting window into early or mid-October. Staff agreed to circulate the applicant form to council members before posting.
The committee emphasized the need to solicit a diverse slate of applicants (tenants, landlords, advocates) and to avoid selecting a group that would be unbalanced toward one interest. No final membership list was presented in the committee meeting; staff were tasked to publish the application, receive submissions, and return candidate lists for council appointment.
