Commissioners pause individual fee-waiver approvals, table Crossings waiver until county policy is drafted

5819273 · September 16, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff requested a pause on ad-hoc fee-waiver approvals to allow a countywide policy and budget review; commissioners directed staff to return with a policy by Oct. 21. The board also voted to table a specific $32,000 building-fee waiver request for the Crossings apartments until the policy is in place.

County staff told the board they will pause decisions on individual fee-waiver requests while they conduct a historic review of fee waivers and forecast budget implications. Commissioners directed staff to return with a proposed fee-waiver policy at the Oct. 21 meeting.

Beth Helmke, interim county administrator, and Dan Short, finance director, said departments set fees based on staff time and that the county needs a consistent, equitable policy because fee-waiver volume and value are growing and can materially affect departmental revenues.

Commissioners discussed the equity of ad-hoc waivers and the need to budget for anticipated fee-waiver activity. One commissioner said staff should take four weeks to prepare a policy and that requests should not be handled as one-offs.

Separately, the board considered a building-fee waiver request of up to $32,000 from the Crossings apartments developer for AMI-restricted affordable units. Staff and commissioners agreed to table that waiver until a fee-waiver policy and process exist and set a return date of Oct. 21. A commissioner emphasized that if the waiver is approved later, the waiver should be tied to specific affordability commitments: two units at 30% AMI and two units at 60% AMI.

Why this matters: Fee waivers reduce departmental revenue used to cover review and permitting costs; without a policy, waivers can create uneven outcomes and budget uncertainty. Linking any waiver to firm affordability targets is a way commissioners signaled they will protect the public benefit in exchange for fiscal concessions.

What happens next: Staff will perform a historical data lookback, model budget impacts, draft a fee-waiver policy covering building permits and other departmental fee waivers, and present the policy at the Oct. 21 commissioners' meeting. The Crossings waiver remains tabled pending that policy.

Ending note: Commissioners said they support affordable housing projects but want a consistent policy and a budgeted approach before committing waivers that could affect departmental operations.