Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Procedural Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sumner County Education Committee approves agenda, minutes and grouped consent items
Summary
At its Sept. 15 meeting the Sumner County Education Committee approved the meeting agenda, the Aug. 4 minutes and a grouped set of consent items including four amendments and item 10c listing work at four elementary schools.
Get email alerts on the Education Procedural Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Sumner County Education Committee on Monday, Sept. 15, approved its meeting agenda, accepted minutes from Aug. 4 and voted to group and approve a set of consent items, including four amendments and an item concerning work at Cannon, Coppiger, Lee and Simulink elementary schools. The committee met at 6:30 p.m. and heard no members of the public during the recognition-of-public portion.
Committee chair opened the session and asked for approval of the agenda; Commissioner Reams moved the motion and Commissioner Lambert seconded. The committee then approved the Aug. 4 minutes. Later in the meeting, members agreed to group and approve four amendments as a single consent action; a motion to do so was seconded by Commissioner Wynne and carried. The committee also approved item 10c, which the chair read as affecting Cannon, Coppiger, Lee and Simulink Elementary; Commissioner Ryan called the vote for that item. A motion to adjourn followed and the meeting ended.
These actions were procedural: the grouped amendments and listed consent items were placed on the record as approved by the committee at this session. The meeting record shows no formal votes recorded by roll call with individual tallies in the transcript; each approval was completed by voice vote with the chair asking, “All in favor, say aye,” and then stating the motions carried.
Committee chair noted logistical matters about future agendas and meeting frequency but did not move any policy changes during this session. No substantive policy debate or public testimony occurred on the consent items during the meeting.
Less-critical items and future agenda planning were mentioned toward the end of the meeting; the committee adjourned after completing the listed approvals.

