Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Asbestos Abatement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Wausau Waterworks prequalifies five contractors for asbestos abatement, conditional on walkthroughs and reference checks
Summary
A Wausau Waterworks board member moved to approve five prequalified bidders for an asbestos abatement project, conditioned on each contractor attending a mandatory walkthrough and satisfactory reference review; the motion passed after affirmative votes.
Speaker 1, a Wausau Waterworks board member, moved to approve five prequalified bidders for the Wausau Waterworks asbestos abatement project and specified conditions for approval. “I’ll make a motion to approve the following prequalified bidders for the Wausau Waterworks asbestos abatement project. Condition on 2 things, that each 1 of these contractors attends the mandatory walk through and, condition on, review of references. I would approve Balisteria Environmental, Hogan Environmental, Mavo Systems Wisconsin, Robinson Brothers Environmental, and the MRD Group. I’ll second that motion. All those in favor?” the speaker said.
The motion covered prequalification only and was conditioned on two items the speaker named: mandatory attendance at a contractor walk-through and staff review of each contractor’s references. The board recorded two affirmative vocal responses, after which the speaker moved toward concluding the vote.
The five contractors identified in the motion were Balisteria Environmental; Hogan Environmental; Mavo Systems Wisconsin; Robinson Brothers Environmental; and the MRD Group. The approval as described in the meeting transcript was for prequalification to participate in the project procurement process rather than a contract award.
Discussion in the transcript did not include additional details on schedule, budget, or who would conduct the reference checks. The transcript also did not specify whether the walk-through dates had been set, how references would be evaluated, or which staff member would complete the reviews.
The record in the transcript ends after the affirmative responses and a subsequent procedural remark toward adjournment; no further procedural votes or contract awards are shown for this agenda item in the provided text.
Less critical details: the motion language in the meeting explicitly tied approval to the two conditions above; the transcript does not record any dissenting votes or requests for further information on the record.
