Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning Commission approves findings recording Oak Street comprehensive-plan amendment

5808065 · September 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

On Sept. 16, 2025, the Planning Commission voted to approve written findings formalizing a prior decision to change a 7.88-acre property on Oak Street from MM1 (light industrial) to R3 (multi-family residential) under file number 25F0008.

Sept. 16, 2025 — The Planning Commission voted Sept. 16 to approve written findings that formalize an earlier decision to amend the comprehensive plan to change a 7.88-acre property on Oak Street from MM1 (light industrial) to R3 (multi‑family residential). The action records the prior vote and creates the official findings for file number 25F0008.

The findings describe the map change for the 7.88-acre subject property and name the applicant appearing in the record, Mark Garrett. Commissioners said the vote at this meeting was to confirm and sign off on the determination made at the previous meeting; they discussed correcting typographical errors in the written findings before finalizing the document. Staff later confirmed the corrections and presented the final document for signature.

Commissioners recorded their approval by voice vote. Commissioners Hanssen, Williams, Mach, Wilder, Schaub, Brock, Hogshead and Mok registered “aye,” and Chair Banducci recorded her assent. The meeting transcript shows the commission took the action to approve the findings; individual roll-call tallies beyond the recorded “ayes” were not fully transcribed.

No additional conditions, permit approvals or subsequent land‑use permits were made at the meeting; the item on Sept. 16 was limited to adopting and signing the written findings to reflect the commission’s earlier decision. The transcript did not specify further procedural steps or deadlines tied to the adopted findings.