Owner seeks side-yard variances at 17 Walnut Street for First-Floor master addition; board opens public hearing

5968407 · September 15, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Tonia Yasenchak of Y Engineering told the Zoning Board of Appeals on Sept. 15 that owner Pablo Berry seeks two side-yard variances at 17 Walnut Street to allow a First-Floor master addition and related remodeling; the public hearing was opened and left pending.

The Zoning Board of Appeals on Sept. 15 heard a request to permit two side-yard variances for an addition at 17 Walnut Street in the UR2/UR(?) district (application 20250734). Tonia Yasenchak of Y Engineering represented owner Pablo Berry and described a resized design that removes a previously approved rear porch and places a First-Floor master suite and mudroom within the current lot footprint.

Requested relief and rationale: The application requests a minimum interior side setback relief (required 8 feet; proposed 2–3.3 feet in places) and a total side-yard relief (required 20 feet; proposed 12.4 feet). The southern side is the active construction side; the northern side already sits very close to the property line (existing condition reported between 1.5 and 2.8 feet), so the applicant said the north-side relief may be necessary to regularize that pre-existing nonconformity even though no new work is planned on that side.

Board questions and review items: Board members asked whether the garage is being demolished (yes), whether the project will remain a one-story garage with no habitable space above (applicant said yes), and requested that building-inspector staff (Patrick) confirm which reliefs are required based on existing footprint and roof overhang measurements. The applicant noted a minor driveway-width variance request (14-foot driveway, slightly above the 25% allowance) and said the overall coverage relief is small; the board will verify calculations.

Next steps: The board opened the public hearing and left the item pending. Staff and the project team were asked to confirm existing north-side measurements, driveway percentage calculations and whether any additional relief is necessary. The applicant anticipates returning with comparables to support the proposal at a future meeting.