Court approves promotion to battalion chief; one magistrate votes no and another abstains over policy concerns

5841298 · September 13, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The fiscal court approved the promotion of Fabian Shields to battalion chief effective Sept. 13; the vote recorded one ‘no’ and one abstention amid concerns about rehiring retirees and opportunities for younger firefighters.

Scott County Fiscal Court approved the promotion of Fabian Shields to battalion chief, effective Sept. 13, by roll-call vote. The recommendation was presented by fire-department leadership, which cited Shields’ more than 23 years of experience and leadership history; the court recorded one “no” vote and one abstention during the roll call.

Staff said Shields has served in leadership roles for more than a decade, holds several technical rescue certifications, and has been recognized within the department. The promotion would take effect at the start of the next pay period with a new hourly rate reported by staff.

The meeting included extended discussion and concerns from some magistrates about using rehired retirees to fill senior leadership roles. One magistrate said the practice might send the wrong message to younger firefighters about advancement opportunities; another requested the interview documentation and written evaluation materials be provided before voting and ultimately abstained. The fire chief and supporters said the selection followed posting and an interview process, noted internal candidates were eligible, and emphasized the need to select the best-qualified leader for high-level command responsibilities.

Vote and next steps: The court conducted a roll-call vote. Several members voted yes; one member recorded a “no” and another abstained. Staff will implement the promotion effective Sept. 13 and update payroll. The court clerk will retain interview documentation and related materials for the personnel file as requested by the magistrate who abstained.

Context: The promotion was discussed under new business; staff said the vacancy was publicly posted for two weeks and applications were reviewed. Court members asked about succession planning and opportunities for internal promotion in future hiring rounds.