Council questions camera program replacement, data privacy and pole-permission delays
Loading...
Summary
Police and councilors discussed aging public‑safety camera infrastructure, grant limits on maintenance funding, delays obtaining utility pole and conduit permissions, and data-sharing limits for speed and red‑light camera programs. The police chief addressed privacy concerns and said camera footage are used regularly in investigations.
City police and councilors discussed the condition, funding and privacy around the city’s public‑safety camera network and related programs during Wednesday’s agenda review. Officials described an aging camera network, challenges getting permissions to use utility poles, and limits on grant funding that historically covered camera installation but not ongoing maintenance and replacement.
Why it matters: The city is seeking funds to replace or upgrade camera infrastructure used for investigations, public safety, and community-requested installations. Councilors raised privacy and data‑sharing questions and sought clarity on who owns and controls camera footage and how third‑party access is handled.
Police leaders said many early camera installs were paid for by state grants and neighborhood requests; those grants typically fund initial installation rather than maintenance or replacement. The department described long lead times — often about six months — to obtain permission from utilities such as National Grid and Verizon to attach cameras to poles. The department said installing city-owned poles or using private‑property attachments has shortened those timelines in some cases.
Councilors pressed staff about privacy and third‑party access. On that question the police chief stated: “We’re not getting anybody’s telephone call information off of these cameras. I can assure you that. There’s not even sound on them.” He added that footage is the police department’s data and that the department uses Axon Air and related protections for data security.
Separately, the agenda included a pending contract and a special committee meeting with Genoptic related to a proposed speed camera installation near STEAM School; city staff said the demonstration program carries strict limitations on sharing camera-captured data and that any third‑party request for footage must go through the city. A staff member summarized the city’s understanding of the vendor contract, saying the city is the owner of data captured by speed and red‑light cameras and that sharing is tightly restricted under the New York State demonstration rules.
Councilors asked staff to schedule a special committee meeting with Genoptic to discuss data‑sharing procedures, insurance and conduit age before approving final permissions for the STEAM School camera. The city said it will bring Genoptic to a committee meeting next week and expects to discuss data privacy and insurance requirements there.
No formal action was taken on Tuesday’s items; staff will return with more detail and with recommendations for replacement funding and permission processes.
