Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Crew Quarters topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners press contractor and legal staff over crew quarters punch list, arc‑fault labels and potential delay penalties
Summary
Staff reported three remaining punch‑list items for the new employee dormitory (lawn reseeding, EV chargers, arc‑fault labels); electrical inspector disagreed on labeling and staff referred delay/penalty questions to legal counsel.
Get email alerts on the Crew Quarters topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The commission received an update on the airport’s new crew quarters and lingering punch‑list items. Airport staff reported three remaining items from the OPM’s punch list: (1) reseeding the lawn around the dormitory (scheduled for Sept. 30), (2) arrival and installation of electric vehicle chargers (shipment moved up, expected next week), and (3) arc‑fault labeling disputes between the contractor and the electrical inspector.
Commissioners asked for clarification about electrical service capacity for a planned basement finish. Staff explained the contractor installed a 600‑amp breaker but only 400‑amp conductors were run from the street; the breaker can be set down to match conductor capacity, but the inspector raised concerns that the oversized breaker could be changed without upgrading conductors. Commissioners asked the designer/OPM for a written confirmation of what was specified versus what was furnished and whether the basement finish work remains feasible without an upgraded service.
Separately, the commission asked legal counsel to review the contract’s liquidated‑damages or delay penalty provisions. Earlier minutes had noted a $1,000‑per‑day delay starting June 30; staff said legal had the contract and was reviewing the claim and would report back in a couple of weeks.
On project closeout matters, the airport manager said staff and the OPM were pursuing the arc‑fault labeling issue with the electrical inspector and the contractor; once resolved the contractor would complete final outstanding work and close the project.

