Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sign Permit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission approves highway-commercial wall sign after staff finds it meets ordinance standards
Summary
The Planning Commission voted to approve a wall-mounted sign for a US‑191-area commercial property after staff concluded the sign fit district standards and was smaller than 20% of the building face; commissioners noted a missing applicant lumen specification in the application requirements.
The Planning Commission approved a sign permit for a commercial property in the highway-commercial district on Nov. 11 after staff concluded the submitted wall sign met the ordinance’s dimensional and location standards. Planning staff told the Commission the sign face measures 148 inches by 46 inches (about 12 feet by 3 feet) and is attached to a building whose front wall was measured at 100 feet; the ordinance limits wall signs to no more than 20% of the front-wall face. "It's less than that. It doesn't exceed the 20% on there where it's only 12 feet wide. And so we're fine there," the presenter said.
Why it matters: staff said the application otherwise satisfied applicable limits for a wall-mounted sign in the highway-commercial district and that the building sits farther than the ordinance’s 500-foot reference distance from US Highway 191. Staff flagged a procedural inconsistency in the sign code: the ordinance references lumen and illumination standards but the application form does not require applicants to submit lumens or lighting specifications. Staff warned that lack of an applicant-provided lumens figure could weaken the county’s position if sign brightness were later litigated.
Vote and motion: a commissioner moved to approve the sign and a second followed; the Chair called for the aye vote and recorded affirmative response. The Commission’s recorded vocal responses included three "Aye" utterances at the meeting; the motion passed.
Conditions and record: no additional conditions were recorded in the meeting beyond the discussion of code consistency. Staff said they will review the sign ordinance for inconsistencies — including conflicting numerical limits in the Spanish Valley provisions — and will return with recommended corrections.
