Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the District Policies topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

School board adopts revisions to multiple district bylaws and policies

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Woodhaven Brownstone Board of Education approved second-reading revisions to numerous bylaws and policies recommended by legal counsel Miller Johnson, covering governance, academic standards, records, employment, safety and student services.

The Woodhaven Brownstone Board of Education on Sept. 9 approved the second reading and adoption of revisions to multiple district bylaws and policies as recommended by legal counsel Miller Johnson.

The board packet and meeting presentation listed specific policy references: 1000.01 (organization and functioning of the board — reimbursement of expenses and indemnification), 2000.02 (learning and achievement — graduation requirements), 2000.03 (education records — directory information), 2000.05 (communication — distribution and posting of materials), 3000.01 (curriculum development), 4000.03 (conditions of employment — earned sick time), 4000.04 (evaluations, discipline and discharge — performance evaluations and performance-based compensation), 4000.05 (other matters of employment — whistleblower protection), 5000.08 (meal charge for food services), 6000.02 (safety and security — behavior threat assessment and management team), 6000.03 (firearms and other weapons — general language and safe storage of firearms), 6000.04 (school crisis response and closure), and 6000.06 (substance-free environment).

The materials stated these revisions were first presented to the board at the Aug. 19, 2025 meeting and were recommended by legal counsel Miller Johnson. President Berry moved approval, Lowry supported the motion, and the board approved the revisions by voice vote.

No roll-call vote totals or substantive amendments were recorded in the meeting transcript; the motion was approved “as presented.”