Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Election Integrity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Multiple public commenters allege statewide voter-roll errors; Kane County board declines immediate action
Summary
Several speakers asserted large-scale errors in Illinois voter registration data and urged the Kane County Board to adopt a resolution demanding audit or data corrections; speakers cited analysis by a volunteer group and asked the board to act, but the board did not endorse a resolution at the meeting.
Get email alerts on the Election Integrity topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Multiple public commenters at the Kane County Board's Sept. 9 meeting made allegations about errors and irregularities in Illinois voter registration and vote counts and urged the board to act. Speakers cited research conducted by the volunteer group Unite for Freedom and called on the board to adopt a resolution demanding corrected, unredacted voter rolls for federal review.
Babe Poxtis and Ken Zitko, representing volunteers connected to Unite for Freedom, told the board their team had analyzed official state election files and reported millions of "material registration errors or omissions" and tens of thousands of "excess votes" in the 2024 general election. They urged the board to adopt a resolution previously submitted to county officials calling for corrective action and transparency.
Other speakers including Tristy Matusic and Jody Zitko emphasized free-speech concerns and contested board procedures at a June meeting that had limited public comment from a previously registered group. Commenters asked the board to support DOJ access to voter rolls for federal review and to press the state for unredacted data, asserting a need for transparency.
Board response: The board received the comments during the public-comment period; no formal motion to adopt the resolution presented by the speakers appeared on the meeting docket and the board did not vote to implement the speakers' requests during the meeting. County staff and legal offices did not make substantive statements endorsing the claims during the session.
Why it matters: Claims about voting data and election integrity are high-profile and potentially consequential. The board did not adopt policy changes at this meeting; reporters and officials should verify the groups' data and any state- or federal-level requests or investigations before treating the numbers as confirmed.
The speakers acknowledged they had provided material to the county board in June and invited board members to consider their resolution for future action.

