Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Assessment And Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
FCPS reports higher SOL pass rates but flags state cut‑score and accountability changes for 2026
Summary
Superintendent Michelle Reid reported higher Fairfax pass rates on Virginia Standards of Learning tests and highlighted concern about proposed cut‑score and accountability changes being phased in by the state; board members asked for modeling and impact analysis.
Get email alerts on the Assessment And Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Fairfax County Public Schools reported Sept. 11 that divisionwide pass rates on the 2025 Virginia Standards of Learning (SOL) and Virginia Alternate Assessment Program (VAAP) tests increased overall and remain above Commonwealth averages, but district leaders warned that pending state changes could materially affect how outcomes are reported.
Superintendent Dr. Michelle Reid told the board that FCPS pass rates "have continued to gradually increase year over year and in all three areas have remained above the Commonwealth standards." She highlighted a 40 percent year-over-year increase in National Merit semifinalists and higher participation in Algebra I by eighth grade, with pass rates for eighth‑grade Algebra I students exceeding division averages.
Dr. Reid and assessment staff noted two technical changes introduced by the Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) for 2025 reporting: high-school math reporting now includes additional high‑school math tests in annual pass rates, and parent/guardian test‑refusal cases are omitted from annual pass-rate calculations. Staff warned these and other reforms will alter year‑to‑year comparability.
Board members expressed concern about proposed new cut scores and a new school performance and support framework that the VDOE planned to release later in September. Miss Huffman, testing lead, said VDOE had not yet released definitive ratings and that the division is modeling potential impacts; she reported that VAAP results improved year over year (reading from 79% to 84%, math from 59% to 68%). Members asked for modeling showing how proposed cut scores (examples shared in staff briefings ranged into the low‑to‑mid 400s) would change pass rates locally.
Speakers also raised equity considerations: pass rates for Hispanic students, economically disadvantaged students and current multilingual learners trailed division averages on the composite charts shown, prompting board requests for disaggregated trend data. Dr. Reid said the division will provide more granular disaggregation in upcoming Goal 3 reports and in Friday letters.
Board members and staff discussed assessment reform timelines. Dr. Reid noted that some statutory or regulatory changes from the General Assembly are scheduled to take effect July 1, 2026, and the division is monitoring the potential impacts on course grading, verified credit and graduation timelines.
What happens next: FCPS staff will supply board members with more detailed disaggregated data, modeling of proposed cut-score impacts, and Goal 3 reporting that includes further breakdowns by subgroup and grade-level trends. The board asked staff to highlight likely effects on graduation, verified credit, and course‑grade calculations.

