Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Board reviews resolution tied to Batista v. Office of Retirement Services settlement (first reading)

September 12, 2025 | Farmington Public School District, School Districts, New York


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board reviews resolution tied to Batista v. Office of Retirement Services settlement (first reading)
The Farmington Public Schools Board of Education held a first reading on Sept. 9 of a resolution related to the settlement in Batista v. Office of Retirement Services, a legal dispute over what compensation counts toward public‑school employee pensions.

The resolution, read at the meeting, would certify that the board “has never provided an increase to any employee's compensation for the purpose of spiking the amount of the employee's final average compensation” as calculated by the Michigan Office of Retirement Services. The resolution is presented to help local boards comply with the settlement terms reached May 16, 2025, in case number 19‑000019‑MZ.

District counsel and staff explained that the settlement affects employees who work outside collective bargaining — described in the meeting as central office, executive assistants and other non‑unit, non‑affiliated employees — and that approximately 106 staff fall into that category. The district's attorney had recommended the resolution, staff said, and the board indicated it would move the item to the action portion of a future meeting for final adoption.

Why it matters: The settlement clarifies how compensation calculations affect state pension benefits for certain public‑school employees. A local resolution attesting to past practices is a common step districts are taking to conform with the settlement and reduce future disputes with the Office of Retirement Services.

What comes next: The board held only a first reading on Sept. 9; staff said the resolution will be moved to an action item at the next meeting for a vote.

Ending: No vote occurred on Sept. 9; trustees heard staff context and will consider formal adoption at a future meeting.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New York articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI