The Montgomery Planning & Zoning Commission on Aug. 5 took no action on a request to build a 30‑by‑45‑foot accessory structure in the rear yard at 706 Caroline Street, citing concerns about exterior materials and visibility from the historic downtown area.

Planning staff described the proposal as a metal‑panel structure placed roughly 100 feet back from the street with a 13‑foot height. Staff noted the city’s historic district guidelines allow metal panels only when the structure is fully screened from view; commissioners and neighbors questioned whether the proposed building would be adequately screened from adjacent historic houses and the street.

Commissioners and nearby residents urged a siding treatment consistent with the historic district’s character. One commissioner asked whether the owner would consider wood siding similar to the house on the lot; neighbors and commissioners said wood siding would better match the downtown context.

Because the application as submitted included metal wall panels that would be visible above a typical six‑foot fence, a commissioner moved to decline the application as submitted and request revised drawings showing wood siding painted to match the residence. The planning director recommended taking no action so the applicant could revise and return; the commission ultimately voted to take no action on the submission to allow the applicant to submit revised plans addressing siding and related details.

Why it matters: The decision delays final action and directs the applicant to present materials that align with the historic district guidelines, preserving visual continuity in downtown Montgomery.

What the commission asked for: Revised drawings that specify wood siding (for walls) painted to match the house and more detailed elevation and material samples. Commissioners also requested additional clarity on roof material and whether a metal roof would be acceptable if colored to match existing shingles.

Next steps: The applicant will return with revised plans addressing siding, color and screening so the commission can consider the request on a future agenda. The commission did not vote to deny the application, so the applicant may revise and resubmit without the item being forwarded to council as a denial.