Assembly holds work session on options to refill Local Education Fund; PILT and sales-tax cap among ideas

5969285 · October 20, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Finance staff and assembly members discussed shifting revenue sources, indexing a sales-tax single-item cap, and other options to close an estimated $1.3 million gap in the Local Education Fund for FY26.

The Ketchikan Gateway Borough Assembly held a work session on Oct. 20 to consider options for restoring the Local Education Fund (LEF) after a shortfall tied to lower-than-expected secure-rural-schools and other revenue changes.

Context: Finance Director Charlene Thomas told the assembly the LEF dipped below the borough’s $2 million floor in FY25 after secure rural schools funding proved far lower than budgeted and the district applied large health-care accruals to its accounts. The assembly’s staff briefing estimated a near-term need of roughly $1.3 million to preserve the floor and cover the school district’s anticipated supplemental requests for FY26.

Revenue options discussed: The staff presented a menu of possibilities, including redirecting existing revenues (federal and local PILT, transient-occupancy tax, marijuana tax, remote-seller sales tax or a fixed percentage of borough sales tax), increasing the property-tax mill levy (an additional 0.5 mills was estimated to raise roughly $1.0 million), and raising the single-unit sales-tax exemption from $2,000 to higher amounts (estimates given for $4,000 and scenarios that would keep contractor exemptions at $2,000). Shifting PILT into the LEF would produce an estimated $1.5 million; dedicating the new transient-occupancy tax revenue was projected to yield roughly $300,000 in FY26.

Debate and considerations: Members repeatedly stressed trade-offs: moving PILT or sales tax revenue into the LEF would reduce general-fund resources that support parks, transit, animal protection and other services unless the general fund is backfilled. Several members favored a combination approach — for example, dedicating transient-occupancy tax receipts to the LEF while raising the single-unit cap to shift more visitor spending into borough coffers — to minimize new burdens on residents. Indexing any new cap to CPI was suggested to avoid repeated reauthorizations.

Follow-up actions: Assembly members asked staff to prepare additional analyses: (1) estimates for raising the single-unit exemption to $5,000 and $6,000; (2) a calculation showing what a 4% assessment increase would contribute to revenue; (3) a memo describing the fiscal impact to the general fund if PILT were redirected; and (4) outreach materials so the assembly can frame any forthcoming ordinance to the public.

Why it matters: The assembly emphasized urgency because the LEF funds school operations and because secure-rural-schools and other federal sources remain uncertain. Members signaled preference for measures that concentrate tourist- and visitor-related revenue (transient-occupancy and higher sales-tax caps) and avoid disproportionately increasing property taxes for residents.