Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Commission approves biometric time‑clock upgrade; separate access‑control platform proposal fails after debate

October 21, 2025 | San Benito, Cameron County, Texas


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commission approves biometric time‑clock upgrade; separate access‑control platform proposal fails after debate
San Benito commissioners voted Oct. 21 to approve a citywide TimeClock Plus time-and-attendance upgrade that uses biometrics and geofencing, while rejecting a separate proposal to buy a unified access-control and video platform proposed by ProTech AV.

The time-clock purchase was characterized by staff as a necessary replacement for aging equipment and as a way to improve accountability and security. Human Resources Director Christine Castillo told the commission the implementation will occur in phases and that staff expect a February go-live for the new system. “There’s phases as well. There’s implementation, so we’re looking [at] going live in February,” Castillo said.

Staff said the TimeClock Plus (TCP) contract replaces unreliable terminals across about a dozen city buildings, adds geofencing and a phone-based clock-in option, and integrates photo verification to reduce “buddy punching.” Sarah Salazar, a TCP representative, described geofencing and IP restrictions that limit remote clock-ins and said the system can be configured differently for field crews and building-based staff.

Commissioners then debated a separate proposal from ProTech AV to implement a Genetec-based unified access-control and video platform across all city buildings and existing cameras. ProTech’s Calvin Womack and Genetec representatives described the platform’s capabilities — camera and door consolidation, analytics, long-term video storage (staff proposed 180 days), and integration options for future expansion.

Opponents raised concerns about system cost, ongoing monthly payments and local broadband capacity. The proposal included a financing option with monthly installments of $9,779.40 over 30 months; staff also presented a cash-purchase alternative. Several commissioners said they preferred starting with a smaller, limited trial or a one-year agreement to test integration and bandwidth implications before committing to a long-term arrangement. One commissioner asked for a proof-of-concept limited to City Hall or a specific set of doors and cameras.

After discussion the commission considered a motion to approve the ProTech/Genetec proposal on the financing terms presented; the motion received a second but the motion failed (three no votes). Later in the meeting the commission approved the TimeClock Plus contract. Staff described the time-clock purchase price as $48,875.53 for a 60‑month term and noted phased implementation and training for staff.

Ending: City staff said they will proceed with TimeClock Plus implementation and promised training and configuration for departmental needs. Commissioners asked staff to return with options for a limited access-control pilot or a shorter-term agreement for further evaluation.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Texas articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI