Council declines to advance purchase of office power-nap pods after no second on motion

5969193 · October 21, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Human Resources proposed purchasing three office power-nap pods for city buildings at an estimated total cost of $30,000; a motion to approve the purchase failed to gather a second and the purchase was not authorized.

Human Resources presented a proposal to purchase three ‘‘power-nap’’ pods to be installed at City Hall, Public Works and Utilities. HR representatives said each pod would cost about $10,000 and highlighted potential wellness benefits (citing research such as a NASA statistic on nap benefits), proposed design features (privacy visors, timers, noise-cancelling and cleanable materials) and suggested funding could be drawn from the HR budget or wellness insurance allowances.

Council questioned logistics, labor-law impacts, sanitation and administration. The city attorney advised that rules around paid breaks and lunch periods could affect how pods are used; staff said pods would be used during break periods and that HR would administer access. The HR budget was described as approximately $1,000,000 and presenters said the $30,000 purchase would represent a small fraction of that amount.

Vice Mayor Kate Sweeney moved to approve purchase of three pods; the motion did not receive a second and therefore failed. No purchase was authorized at the meeting.

Council asked staff to consider labor-law implications and operational policies (e.g., whether use would take place during unpaid breaks or lunch periods) before any future motion.