Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bma Updates topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Manchester housing commission reviews BMA notices including 944 Elm tax-relief filing and Grand Central Suites lien change
Summary
The Manchester Housing Commission reviewed recent Board of Mayor and Aldermen (BMA) agenda items, including a public notice for tax-relief at 944 Elm Street, a lien-priority change for the Grand Central Suites project, and a large Hackett Hill residential and mixed‑use proposal tied to an innovation zone rezoning.
The Manchester Housing Commission on June 11 reviewed several Board of Mayor and Aldermen items that could affect local housing supply and redevelopment.
Commission members discussed that 944 Elm Street had been publicly announced to the BMA as an application for tax-relief under the city's redevelopment incentive program; details about the specific request and the project scope were not yet available, and the commission was advised to monitor the July 1 BMA agenda for a public hearing. The commission noted that these tax-relief filings are typically introduced as public notice by the Manchester Economic Development Office and that specifics are often provided at the subsequent BMA meeting.
Members also reviewed a BMA decision allowing Grand Central Suites — a multi‑story development on Central Avenue adjacent to Veterans Park — to change the priority of a lien so the project's private lender would be first in line for insurance or other proceeds. Commission members said the lien-priority change was granted because the funder required first priority for financing; in the presentation to the BMA, staff said the project would not proceed without that accommodation.
The commission received information about a large development proposed for Hackett Hill: an initial phase of about 230 townhouse units followed by a mixed‑use phase that would add roughly 96 residential units above first-floor retail (approximately 48,000 square feet of retail space in total). The proposal is linked to a planned rezoning to create a special "innovation zone." Commission members said city staff are working to reconcile zoning and departmental feedback before a public‑comment release of a version 2 of the zoning code update.
Commissioners discussed a recurring concern: commitments made during early design and permitting (for example, parking, unit counts or amenities) can be reduced as projects advance through variances, financing, and final permits. Members said the commission has no enforcement authority over BMA approvals and urged tracking of initial commitments so the public record shows what changed during approvals.
The commission asked members to watch the July 1 BMA meeting for follow-up on 944 Elm and other active items and for packet documents that typically appear before that meeting.
Ending: The commission did not take a formal vote on these items; members agreed to continue monitoring the listed BMA items and to circulate BMA packets to the commission ahead of the next meeting.
