Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Sales Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council defers multiple private-sale redevelopment items amid questions about offers, pricing and grocery-store plans
Summary
Several private-sale redevelopment and land-sale items were deferred after council members questioned the list of letters of intent (LOIs), the proposed sale price of city-owned lots and whether a new West Ward project would be a grocery store or a convenience store.
The Newark Municipal Council deferred multiple private-sale redevelopment items and asked staff for more information about competing offers and project specifications.
Council members pressed the Economic and Housing Development (EHD) office for a list of letters of intent submitted for the properties under consideration, saying the council previously received such lists but had not been provided them recently. Councilman Ramos asked staff to provide the number of LOIs that were submitted so the council can confirm whether the group being recommended was the only respondent.
The council also debated the advertised selling price of a city parcel with an assessed value of $451,800 that, according to the agenda presentation, is slated to sell for $169,000. Councilman Gonzales questioned the per-square-foot sale price—stated in the presentation as $20 per square foot—arguing that comparable prices in Newark’s market are often above $50 per square foot and that the city should seek higher proceeds given its fiscal condition.
Separately, council members raised concerns about agenda item 7 r 2 B, a proposal described in the packet as the new construction of a mixed-use building with a grocery store in the West Ward. Council members said, on the record, that the project contact later indicated the use would be a convenience store, not a grocery store. Brandy Daniel, legislative coordinator for Economic and Housing Development, told the council she would confirm the tenant type and said she expected to have the corrected language available for amendment at the next meeting.
Several items were formally deferred at the pre-meeting; some amendments changing contracting entity names (for example, a first amendment to the sale and redevelopment agreement for MB Development and Management LLP and a first amendment for Genesis Capital Investments LLC) were introduced and seconded. Council members requested staff follow-up on LOIs, confirmation of tenant types, and better price justification before final action.
No final sales were approved during the pre-meeting; deferred items and the requested information will be returned to the council for consideration at a later meeting.
