Design Review Board members were unable to reach a conclusive determination about whether a small garage at 176 Lake Avenue is historically or architecturally significant on Sept. 10 and advised the applicant to return to the board’s next full meeting.

Applicant Randall Williams said the garage is a later, altered structure that had been modernized; he said the building does not retain character‑defining features and the owner needs the rear area for additional parking and safer drop‑off for a dental practice on-site. Planning and board members inspected photos included in the packet and discussed whether the existing building retained sufficient integrity to be considered significant.

Board members were divided during discussion. Some said that although the garage is old, it had been substantially altered (vinyl siding, modern garage door, low ceiling) and did not appear to retain historic integrity; others stressed that accessory structures contribute to neighborhood pattern and warned against routine removal. Because only four board members attended, and the group’s split meant a conclusive vote could not be guaranteed at that meeting, the board advised the applicant to return to the next full meeting so a four-of-seven majority could be reached. The applicant left with guidance to meet with staff and bring additional materials if needed.