Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Design Review Board requires restoring double-hung windows, preserves front siding at Beagle School at 115 Regent St.

September 10, 2025 | Saratoga Springs City, Saratoga County, New York


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Design Review Board requires restoring double-hung windows, preserves front siding at Beagle School at 115 Regent St.
The Beagle School’s application to replace and repair windows and alter exterior siding at 115 Regent Street split the Design Review Board on Sept. 10. After a lengthy presentation by the applicant’s architect and preservation contractor, the board approved restoring the Second‑Floor double‑hung windows and directed that the front siding remain rather than be removed; it left the casement-window decisions to a later submittal pending building‑code clarification.

Architect Artur Dabrowski (Balzer and Tuck) and contractor consultants described on-site hazardous-material testing that found trace amounts of asbestos in paint on some siding. They proposed aluminum‑clad wood windows as replacements for some in‑swing casements where safety/equipment concerns and modern egress requirements could not be met by retrofit hardware. School representatives emphasized safety for preschool children and said they preferred new windows with integrated safety hardware. The preservation foundation asked the board to favor restoration where feasible.

Board members agreed they preferred to preserve character‑defining wood windows where possible. After discussion the board voted to restore the double‑hung front windows, require the casement windows to be reviewed further (the applicant may return with code guidance or alternate egress measures), and keep the front siding in place rather than approve wholesale replacement. The motion (moved by Rob DeBauf, seconded by Jeff Wood) passed in voice vote.

Board members and the applicant discussed remediation protocols: staff and several board members noted that trace asbestos often does not require abatement if left undisturbed and that routine construction protocols (PPE, containment) are standard when work will disturb materials. The board invited the applicant to return with additional documentation, including any final building-department guidance on egress requirements for the Second Floor.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New York articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI