Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hampton Bays board hears Secret Service threat-assessment presentation and ‘‘Handle With Care’’ partnership update

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its Oct. 21 business meeting the Hampton Bays Union Free School District board heard a presentation from district staff summarizing a Secret Service National Threat Assessment Center briefing and described a multi‑partner ‘‘Handle With Care’’ program operating on the East End; the board took only procedural votes during the segment.

HAMPTON BAYS, N.Y. — At the Hampton Bays Union Free School District Board of Education business meeting on Oct. 21, district staff presented a threat‑assessment briefing from the U.S. Secret Service’s National Threat Assessment Center and described the district’s participation in a multi‑partner ‘‘Handle With Care’’ program for East End high schools.

The presentation, delivered during the meeting’s regular agenda, outlined recent work with local police and university partners. A district staff member said, "It's been about 8 years, I think, since we've had a threat assessment presentation at the Secret Service National Threat Assessment Center," and described the ‘‘Handle With Care’’ effort as a continuing program across Southampton and adjoining communities.

The staff member characterized the program as a three‑way partnership involving high schools on the East End, local police and Southampton University and said the district participated in a pilot of the initiative last semester. The staff member added that the partnership with police "continues to become more sophisticated." The presentation segment did not include a formal board vote on policy or funding for the initiative.

During the same portion of the meeting the board conducted two procedural voice votes. The board approved a motion to set the order of the agenda and approved a subsequent procedural motion; both passed by voice vote with the chair calling for