Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Exception Personal Care Home topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission delays vote on proposed six‑client personal care home at 3602 Abbey Road after neighborhood concerns
Summary
The Augusta Planning Commission postponed action on a special exception request to establish a family personal care home for six clients at 3602 Abbey Road after neighborhood opposition; staff had recommended approval subject to conditions, and the commission directed staff to facilitate a neighborhood meeting and continue the item to next month.
Get email alerts on the Special Exception Personal Care Home topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Augusta Planning Commission on Aug. 4 postponed a decision on a petition to establish a family personal care home for six clients at 3602 Abbey Road, voting to defer the special exception for 30 days so the petitioner can meet with neighborhood representatives.
Amanda Cruz, planner I with planning and development staff, said the 0.31‑acre property in the Barton Chapel Hill subdivision contains a one‑story, 2,008‑square‑foot residence built in 1972 and that the applicant proposed no additions. The petitioner asked to operate a family personal care home with up to six residents; staff reported the home contains five bedrooms and two and a half bathrooms and that public water is present but public sewer is not. Cruz said the proposal is located in the South Augusta character area and that staff found the proposal compatible with surrounding uses and consistent with the 2023 comprehensive plan.
Cruz briefed the commission on additional factual details included in the staff report: the home would be staffed with one staff member per shift; there are no other family personal care homes within 1,200 feet; Barton Chapel Road is a minor arterial while Abbey Road is a local road; the nearest bus stop is about 165 feet away; and the property is not in a FEMA special flood hazard area nor on mapped wetlands.
The petitioner (identified on the petition as Duranda Anna Aponach) introduced herself to the commission and described healthcare experience: “We are health care workers with experience with, over 15 years of experience in that industry,” and said she focuses on elderly care and has family ties to the area. She told the commission the operation would provide daily living assistance and coordinate with home‑health agencies for medications and medical appointments.
Residents from the area spoke in opposition. Charles Carson, neighborhood president, said neighborhood residents were not notified in advance and said he would have preferred to have met the petitioner first. Eric Gaines, who owns the adjacent property at 3604 Abbey Road, said he believed the purchasers intended to live in the house and expressed concerns about traffic, neighborhood character and property values. Barbara Pulliam said the site’s steep access and nearby busy road create safety and access concerns for residents and visiting staff. Corinthia Newsome Davis questioned whether the petitioners would place such a facility in their own neighborhood and said the answer informed her opposition.
Planning staff recommended approval of the special exception with conditions, including: a 6‑resident maximum (counting any live‑in staff toward that total); successful completion of a code enforcement inspection before issuance of a business license; requirement to obtain and maintain a City of Augusta business license and state licensure; proof of compliance with the OCGA provision cited in the staff report (referenced in the packet as chapter 290‑2‑5‑18 of the OCGA); annual inspection reporting; operation in compliance with state Department of Community Health rules for family personal care homes; and a prohibition on signage on the property.
A city legal advisor explained on the record that while the commission can deny a special exception, statutes and case law grant protections for personal care homes and characterize them as residential uses; a denial without a concrete, defendable reason (for example, insufficient space or a specific code violation) could invite legal challenge. The legal advisor said those protections informed staff’s recommendation to approve with conditions.
Commissioner Prince moved to postpone the petition for 30 days so the petitioner could meet with neighborhood representatives; the motion was seconded, carried, and the commission instructed planning staff to facilitate the neighborhood meeting. The item will return to the commission at its next monthly meeting (October meeting was referenced for rescheduling).

