Glens Falls resident seeks 6-inch setback variance for backyard pool

A Glens Falls City resident asked the planning body for a 6-inch setback variance so the applicant could install a pool inside an existing six-foot fenced yard.

The request came during discussion of accessory-structure setbacks. "We're just looking to install a pool in our yard, and I guess we don't have enough green space, and we're looking for 6 inches on the back fence line," the Resident said. The applicant said the yard is enclosed by a six-foot vinyl fence and that neighbors had not objected: "I haven't had any objections from any neighbors that I know of."

Planning staff reviewed setback rules for accessory structures greater than 100 square feet and noted a 10-foot side- and rear-yard setback standard. The Resident said the proposed layout leaves 9 feet 6 inches at the rear and that the surveyor indicated the pool could be moved forward 6 inches to meet the 10-foot requirement: "So I could go forward 6 inches...I could move it 6 inches like I said." Staff confirmed that moving the pool forward on the lot line would address the setback shortfall.

The Resident described the property as well maintained and said it is screened from view: "There are other pools in the neighborhood with less green space...mine is behind vinyl fence. I think we've beautified the neighborhood with our house." The transcript includes no formal objections from nearby property owners recorded during the discussion.

No formal vote or final action on the variance is recorded in the transcript. The discussion noted that the surveyor can adjust the pool location and that meeting follow-up would reflect whether the applicant proceeds with moving the pool to meet the 10-foot setback.

Less-critical technical and permitting details — including final site measurements, any required permit applications, and whether the applicant will formally file for a variance if the pool is not moved — were not specified in the transcript.