Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ordinance Floodplain topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning board previews June 2026 ordinance work, flags floodplain code conflicts for follow-up with state

5964453 · October 21, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members discussed potential zoning and ordinance changes for June 2026 — including short-term rental licensing, street standards, workforce housing and limits on developers with incomplete projects — and asked staff to consult code officials and state floodplain managers about conflicts between building codes and local flood rules.

At the meeting’s other-business segment the Wells Planning Board reviewed a list of potential ordinance changes to be worked on for the June 2026 town ballot and spent substantial time on floodplain-management policy and code conflicts.

Ordinance items and process - Staff said proposed topics for June 2026 include short-term rental licensing, street-standards revisions (in light of state LD 1829 and potential higher lot densities), timber-harvesting rules, and workforce-housing language. The board and staff agreed to pare down the list and prioritize items that need town action next year. - Board members asked that ordinance language prepared for the ballot be clear and accompanied by full explanatory material; they discussed the town’s past practice of not providing full text for special town meetings and suggested mailing full language to voters when amendments go to a ballot.

Floodplain and building-code issues - Planning staff and board members noted inconsistencies between parts of the International Building Code/International Residential Code (IBC/IRC) as adopted by the state and the town’s own flood ordinance. Staff recommended consultation with the code officer and with the state floodplain manager (DEP or state FEMA liaison) to resolve conflicts and to draft user-friendly local language. - Board members raised policy tradeoffs: how to treat maintenance versus substantial improvement, whether to allow a multi-year reset of “market value” triggers for flood-elevation requirements, and how to avoid disincentivizing maintenance for long-standing seasonal cottages. Members expressed concern that overly strict rules could produce unintended consequences for elderly or modest homeowners who cannot afford major elevating work.

Enforcement and developer accountability - Members renewed interest in an ordinance change that would give the town more leverage to prohibit new building permits for developers who have not completed previously approved projects; staff observed that rewriting such enforcement language will require legal review and careful drafting.

Next steps: Staff will prepare draft language for prioritized ordinance items, consult the town code officer and state floodplain authorities on specific flood-related conflicts, and bring a clearer draft back for planning board review before public outreach and inclusion on the June 2026 ballot.