Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Professional Licensing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Kansas Board of Pharmacy moves to broaden withdrawn‑application protection and ease technician exam extensions

5964098 · October 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Kansas Board of Pharmacy told JCAR it will revoke and re‑adopt an application rule so incomplete applications can be considered withdrawn for all license types, and will relax timing and reason‑requirements for pharmacy technician exam extension requests.

The Kansas State Board of Pharmacy proposed regulatory changes to treat incomplete applications as withdrawn across all licensing categories and to ease timing and justification requirements for pharmacy technician certification‑exam extensions.

Bradford DeYoung, representing the Board of Pharmacy, told the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules and Regulations that the board will revoke KAR 68‑1‑1a (which applies to pharmacist registrations) and adopt KAR 68‑7‑26 in its place, placing the withdrawn‑application language in article 7 (miscellaneous) so it applies to licenses, permits and registrations beyond just pharmacists. DeYoung said the change preserves a “safety valve” that lets the board treat long‑uncured incomplete applications as withdrawn rather than denied, avoiding disciplinary records and national reporting consequences for applicants who simply never completed paperwork.

The board is also proposing to amend KAR 68‑5‑17 related to pharmacy technician certification exams. Current regulation requires a written six‑month extension request submitted at least 30 days before registration expiration and requires a stated reason. The board would remove the 30‑day advance‑notice deadline and the requirement to provide a reason, allowing technicians to request the extension up to the expiration date and without disclosing the reason for delay. DeYoung said the change reflects compassion for applicants who may face family emergencies or other personal obstacles.

The committee did not oppose the changes during the hearing; board representatives described the intent as minimizing unnecessary discipline and administrative burden while preserving the board’s ability to make merit‑based licensing decisions.

Ending: The Board of Pharmacy said the reworked rule will apply the withdrawn‑application safety valve across application types and will simplify the process for technicians seeking time to pass required certification exams.