Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Intergovernmental Relations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Brookings school board declines to set special meeting on city land collaboration; members debate timing and public input
Summary
The Brookings School District 05-1 board debated whether to call a special session to discuss its collaboration with the city over district land assets and obligations related to Hillcrest School, but a motion to schedule a special meeting before the city’s Nov. 3 public forum failed on a roll call vote.
Get email alerts on the Intergovernmental Relations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Brookings School District 05-1 board debated whether to call a special session to discuss its collaboration with the city over district land assets and obligations related to Hillcrest School, but a motion to schedule a special meeting before the city’s Nov. 3 public forum failed on a roll call vote.
At the workshop, a board member moved "to add a special meeting to just discuss our collaboration based on our land assets, and that relationship with the city." Several board members said they supported the idea of a focused single-topic meeting, but they disagreed on timing and process. One board member said public conversation should come first: "For me, the public conversations need to happen first, and then we can step back and have these conversations." Another board member said the full board had not had enough time to address city relationships and wanted a closed discussion among all board members before public engagement.
Superintendent (Dr. Schultz, referenced in the discussion) told the board there are multiple existing agreements with the city, and that one agreement related to Hillcrest requires rectification within a five-year period; she recommended that board members understand the information being shared publicly before the board takes further steps. Some board members proposed that representatives (for example, two board members or members of the finance and facilities committees) meet with city staff prior to the city forum to understand what will be presented.
During discussion board members raised these specific points: the city plans a public forum on Nov. 3; Hillcrest-related obligations to the city require action to resolve outstanding issues; some board members preferred a post-forum full-board discussion while others wanted a pre-forum board meeting or small-board delegation; and the timing of any special session should not duplicate or preempt the city’s public outreach.
A roll call vote was taken after the motion was seconded; the chair announced, "Motion does not carry." The board then adjourned the workshop without scheduling the special session.
Votes at a glance - Motion to approve the agenda as proposed (moved and seconded during the meeting): approved (agenda was approved as modified during the meeting). No individual roll-call tallies were specified in the transcript. - Motion to add a special meeting to discuss district collaboration with the city on land assets: moved (transcript: "I'd like to make a motion to add a special meeting..."), seconded; outcome: failed ("Motion does not carry"). - Motion to adjourn the meeting: approved (meeting adjourned).

