Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Sewer Feasibility topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning staff asks Office of Law to review Manor Center water designation recommendation after public-works funding concern

5963885 · October 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Planning staff reported that the Planning Board's recommendation to change Manor Center's water designation from W7 to W3 (keeping sewer as S7) included a feasibility-study condition; the public-works director said no funds are programmed and requested legal review of the recommendation.

Planning staff told the Baltimore County Planning Board on Oct. 16 that a recommendation sent from the board to county leadership to change the Manor Center water designation from W7 to W3 (sewer designation S7 retained) includes a condition that the county conduct a feasibility study to estimate cost and service areas for any proposed waterline extension.

Director-level staff informed the board that the Department of Public Works and Transportation does not have funds programmed for such a feasibility study; the director asked the Office of Law to review the recommendation. Planning staff said they will share the office-of-law response with the board when it becomes available.

Separately, staff reported a resolution introduced by County Councilman David Marks related to return of zoning designations for three CZMP (comprehensive zoning map process) issues along Philadelphia Road (5-095, 5-171 and a portion of 5-096). The resolution was described as reversing council-level zoning changes for those parcels to the zoning classifications that existed before the council action; staff said the resolution would be voted on by County Council on Oct. 20.

The board received the updates as information; no board action was recorded on the feasibility-funding question or the Council resolution during the Oct. 16 meeting.